![]() ![]() Which One is Better? Which One to Choose? Today we will see how its own jackets compare to each other. We picked Patagonia because it is one of the best brands in the outdoor apparel market and one that we have frequently featured in our selections, comparisons and reviews (for example, here, here and here). Today’s purpose is not to establish which of these two designs is superior to the other, but rather to look at their differences and similarities and determine which one you should choose depending on the activity and weather conditions you will be in. These are two of the most popular Patagonia jackets, renowned for their performance, insulation and high breathability. This time we picked two Patagonia jackets, the Nano Air® and Nano Puff® designs. Well, now that winter is so close, it is time to look at two other jackets made for the cold. Rab Alpha flux jacket 90g direct insulation is probably pretty comparable to the nano air light in performance and the stretchy face fabric is pretty similar.In our latest jacket comparison, where we looked at Montreal and Montreaux coats for women by Marmot, we went through a number of details that those two designs came with and how you can best utilize those jackets for a well-rounded experience in the cold. So the Rab Alpha Direct with 120g insulation is probably equivalent in warmth to a jacket with 60g fullrange/coreloft/primaloft. ![]() If I had to guess I'd say the Polartec Alpha Direct insulation is about half as warm for a given weight than regular active insulation (Coreloft, Primaloft, Fullrange) but then you save weight since it lacks an inner shell so the overall weight of the jacket is similar. The airy design is very breathable and the inner fabric seems durable enough. Worn next to skin or base layer the naked insulation transports moisture to the surface of the jacket, while the fabric pile still traps plenty of warmth. A pack can keep you pretty warm and the hybrid is cheaper, but unfortunately lacks a hood.Ī lot of companies are using "Polartec Alpha Direct" insulation that has exposed insulation on the inside of the jacket. ![]() Nano Air Light Hybrid has no insulation in the back, which might be an advantage if you're carrying a backpack. Outdoor research Uberlayer is warm and very breathable, but significantly heavier than the Nano Air. The North Face Ventrix has 80g/m2 of a similar active insulation, a little cheaper and good reviews, but people don't seem to like TNF here. The Proton line is more breathable than their Atom line for intense activities, but as a result it has less protection from the wind. Some other "active insulation" pieces comparable to the nano air:Īrc'teryx Proton LT (coreloft 65g/m2) and the warmer Proton AR (coreloft 90g/m2). Cons with the standard NA is that it might be too warm and is heavier. Also minimal feature may be a con depending on the person. Its $100 more than an R1 for only a couple oz lighter, and a little more versatility, all other features pretty much the same. I havent really tested it much in the field besides walks around my neighborhood in 20F weather with a baselayer and a shell, but its surprisingly warm, similar warmth to a UL puffy like a ghost whisper but it breathes really well so you can use it as an active piece like a fleece.īiggest con of the NAL is cost. I dont know if I coulda ponied up the cash for one on my own. I have a nano air light and I like it a lot, but it was a Christmas gift. Also the cuff of the wrists is different on the Light version and theres some slight cosmetic differences like mock baffling on the standard version, shop Patagonia's website to compare. It lacks all those features in the name of saving weight. The light version has thinner insulation, and does not have hand warmer pockets, a waist draw string, full zipper, or a second breast pocket like the standard Nano Air has. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |